You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominique Kinnett-Hopkins, Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty, Linda Ehrlich-Jones, Deborah Crown, Rachel A. Bond, Marc H. Applebaum, Arun Jayaraman, Catherine Furbish, Gail Forrest, Edelle Field-Fote, Allen W. Heinemann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 40 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,391,368
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#472
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,799
of 401,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.