You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Health-related quality of life and physical recovery after a critical illness: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical rehabilitation program
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc10265 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Doug Elliott, Sharon McKinley, Jennifer Alison, Leanne M Aitken, Madeleine King, Gavin D Leslie, Patricia Kenny, Penny Taylor, Rachel Foley, Elizabeth Burmeister |
Abstract |
Significant physical sequelae exist for some survivors of a critical illness. There are, however, few studies that have examined specific interventions to improve their recovery, and none have tested a home-based physical rehabilitation program incorporating trainer visits to participants' homes. This study was designed to test the effect of an individualised eight-week home-based physical rehabilitation program on recovery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 33% |
United States | 2 | 10% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 5% |
Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
Greece | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
Scientists | 3 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 312 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 50 | 16% |
Researcher | 40 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 11% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
Other | 57 | 18% |
Unknown | 91 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 8% |
Unknown | 105 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,858,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,446
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,411
of 124,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.