↓ Skip to main content

Health-related quality of life and physical recovery after a critical illness: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical rehabilitation program

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
319 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health-related quality of life and physical recovery after a critical illness: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical rehabilitation program
Published in
Critical Care, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/cc10265
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doug Elliott, Sharon McKinley, Jennifer Alison, Leanne M Aitken, Madeleine King, Gavin D Leslie, Patricia Kenny, Penny Taylor, Rachel Foley, Elizabeth Burmeister

Abstract

Significant physical sequelae exist for some survivors of a critical illness. There are, however, few studies that have examined specific interventions to improve their recovery, and none have tested a home-based physical rehabilitation program incorporating trainer visits to participants' homes. This study was designed to test the effect of an individualised eight-week home-based physical rehabilitation program on recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 312 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 16%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Other 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Other 57 18%
Unknown 91 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 18%
Sports and Recreations 15 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 105 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,858,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,446
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,411
of 124,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.