↓ Skip to main content

Informal carers’ experience and outcomes of assistive technology use in dementia care in the community: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Informal carers’ experience and outcomes of assistive technology use in dementia care in the community: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-1081-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vimal Sriram, Crispin Jenkinson, Michele Peters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Unspecified 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 50 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Unspecified 12 9%
Psychology 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 51 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,499,715
of 23,237,082 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,518
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,143
of 348,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#40
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,237,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.