↓ Skip to main content

Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to 'Best Practice' standards - are the results repeatable?
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-7161-7-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maksym Borysov, Artem Borysov

Abstract

Claims have been made in a pilot study that a new form of short-term rehabilitation according to 'Best Practice' standards would change signs and symptoms of patients with scoliosis in the short-term. Aim of this study is to repeat the study published 2010 with a larger sample of patients using the same protocol. Both authors have undergone training in this special approach to scoliosis rehabilitation in 2010.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 26%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#277
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,211
of 251,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.