↓ Skip to main content

Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-6-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciano E Mignini, Khalid S Khan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 94 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 28 28%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 35%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,485,442
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,092
of 2,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,494
of 67,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.