You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Approaches of integrating the development of guidelines and quality indicators: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05665-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miranda W. Langendam, Thomas Piggott, Monika Nothacker, Arnav Agarwal, David Armstrong, Tejan Baldeh, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Carolina Castro Martins, Andrea Darzi, Itziar Etxeandia, Ivan Florez, Jan Hoving, Samer G. Karam, Thomas Kötter, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Reem A. Mustafa, Giovanna E. U. Muti-Schünemann, Philip J. van der Wees, Markus Follmann, Holger J. Schünemann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 25% |
| Colombia | 2 | 7% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 57% |
| Scientists | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,140,987
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#787
of 8,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,352
of 415,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#17
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.