↓ Skip to main content

Genetic modifiers ameliorate endocytic and neuromuscular defects in a model of spinal muscular atrophy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic modifiers ameliorate endocytic and neuromuscular defects in a model of spinal muscular atrophy
Published in
BMC Biology, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12915-020-00845-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melissa B. Walsh, Eva Janzen, Emily Wingrove, Seyyedmohsen Hosseinibarkooie, Natalia Rodriguez Muela, Lance Davidow, Maria Dimitriadi, Erika M. Norabuena, Lee L. Rubin, Brunhilde Wirth, Anne C. Hart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 29%
Neuroscience 4 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 6 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,111,929
of 19,026,578 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#629
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,349
of 319,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,026,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them