↓ Skip to main content

Cryopreservation of mouse resources

Overview of attention for article published in Laboratory Animal Research, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 102)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Cryopreservation of mouse resources
Published in
Laboratory Animal Research, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42826-020-00066-w
Authors

Toru Takeo, Satohiro Nakao, Yoshiko Nakagawa, Jorge M. Sztein, Naomi Nakagata

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Other 2 22%
Lecturer 1 11%
Librarian 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2020.
All research outputs
#11,101,374
of 18,908,606 outputs
Outputs from Laboratory Animal Research
#35
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,347
of 319,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Laboratory Animal Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,908,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them