↓ Skip to main content

An improved strategy to analyse strigolactones in complex sample matrices using UHPLC–MS/MS

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An improved strategy to analyse strigolactones in complex sample matrices using UHPLC–MS/MS
Published in
Plant Methods, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-00669-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristýna Floková, Mahdere Shimels, Beatriz Andreo Jimenez, Nicoletta Bardaro, Miroslav Strnad, Ondřej Novák, Harro J. Bouwmeester

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 24 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 24 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,017,278
of 23,779,713 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#158
of 1,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,326
of 409,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,779,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.