You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of abiotic factors, habitat type and urban wildlife on the ecology of hard ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in urban and peri-urban habitats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-020-04352-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Silvia-Diana Borşan, Andra Toma-Naic, Áron Péter, Attila D. Sándor, Cosmin Peștean, Andrei-Daniel Mihalca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,848,201
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,219
of 5,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,339
of 408,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#41
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.