You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulation as a pedagogical learning method for critical paediatric nursing in Bachelor of Nursing programmes: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-020-00140-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iben Akselbo, Heidi Killingberg, Ingvild Aune |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,696,147
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#171
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,901
of 399,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.