↓ Skip to main content

Raised serum levels of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Raised serum levels of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12890-016-0249-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Guiot, B. Bondue, M. Henket, J. L. Corhay, R. Louis

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic lung disorder of unknown origin, which ultimately leads to death. Several growth factors such as IGFs (insulin-like-growth factor) and IGFBPs (insulin like growth factor binding proteins) seem to take part to the pathogenesis. We evaluated IGFs and IGFBPs in serum from patients with IPF and healthy subjects including 24 untreated IPF and 26 IPF receiving anti-fibrotic therapy and to compare them with healthy subjects. Serum of 50 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and 55 healthy subjects (HS) were analysed by ELISA for IGFs and IGFBPs, TGF-β and KL-6, the latter being tested as positive control in IPF. Serum levels of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 and KL-6 were significantly higher in the IPF group than in the healthy subjects (p < 0.05, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001 respectively) while the picture was inversed regarding IGFs. By contrast there was no significant difference between the groups with respect to TGF-β. IGFBP-2 was significantly reduced in the patients with specific anti-fibrotic therapy pirfenidone and nintedanib compared to untreated patients (p < 0.05) but still significantly elevated in comparison to HS (p < 0.001). Serum IGFBP-1 and -2 are increased in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and IGFBP-2 may be reduced by anti-fibrosing therapy. IGFBPs may be promising biomarkers in IPF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,588
of 1,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,354
of 333,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#34
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.