You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating effectiveness of screening house eaves as a potential intervention for reducing indoor vector densities and malaria prevalence in Nyabondo, western Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03413-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Njoroge Ng’ang’a, Collins Okoyo, Charles Mbogo, Clifford Maina Mutero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#12,982,550
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,059
of 5,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,868
of 408,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#53
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.