↓ Skip to main content

Is tracheostomy a better choice than translaryngeal intubation for critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days? A comparison of short-term outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is tracheostomy a better choice than translaryngeal intubation for critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 14 days? A comparison of short-term outcomes
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12871-015-0159-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei-Chieh Lin, Chang-Wen Chen, Jung-Der Wang, Liang-Miin Tsai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Unknown 28 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,633,726
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#688
of 1,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,975
of 392,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,526 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.