↓ Skip to main content

Economic costs of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in European and Australian clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic costs of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia among patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in European and Australian clinical practice
Published in
BMC Cancer, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-12-362
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek Weycker, Aurelie Danel, Anne Marciniak, Kate Bendall, Michael Lipsitz, Ruth Pettengell

Abstract

Economic implications of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in European and Australian clinical practice are largely unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Other 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,313,878
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,416
of 8,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,643
of 169,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#78
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.