You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Blood lipids influence DNA methylation in circulating cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-1000-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koen F. Dekkers, Maarten van Iterson, Roderick C. Slieker, Matthijs H. Moed, Marc Jan Bonder, Michiel van Galen, Hailiang Mei, Daria V. Zhernakova, Leonard H. van den Berg, Joris Deelen, Jenny van Dongen, Diana van Heemst, Albert Hofman, Jouke J. Hottenga, Carla J. H. van der Kallen, Casper G. Schalkwijk, Coen D. A. Stehouwer, Ettje F. Tigchelaar, André G. Uitterlinden, Gonneke Willemsen, Alexandra Zhernakova, Lude Franke, Peter A. C. ’t Hoen, Rick Jansen, Joyce van Meurs, Dorret I. Boomsma, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Marleen M. J. van Greevenbroek, Jan H. Veldink, Cisca Wijmenga, BIOS Consortium, Erik W. van Zwet, P. Eline Slagboom, J. Wouter Jukema, Bastiaan T. Heijmans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| France | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 55% |
| Scientists | 12 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 22% |
| Researcher | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,571,013
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,265
of 4,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,264
of 368,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#17
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.