↓ Skip to main content

Novel origins of copy number variation in the dog genome

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel origins of copy number variation in the dog genome
Published in
Genome Biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-r73
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas Berglund, Elisa M Nevalainen, Anna-Maja Molin, Michele Perloski, The LUPA Consortium, Catherine André, Michael C Zody, Ted Sharpe, Christophe Hitte, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, Hannes Lohi, Matthew T Webster

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Copy number variants (CNVs) account for substantial variation between genomes and are a major source of normal and pathogenic phenotypic differences. The dog is an ideal model to investigate mutational mechanisms that generate CNVs as its genome lacks a functional ortholog of the PRDM9 gene implicated in recombination and CNV formation in humans. Here we comprehensively assay CNVs using high-density array comparative genomic hybridization in 50 dogs from 17 dog breeds and 3 gray wolves. RESULTS: We use a stringent new method to identify a total of 430 high-confidence CNV loci, which range in size from 9 kb to 1.6 Mb and span 26.4 Mb, or 1.08%, of the assayed dog genome, overlapping 413 annotated genes. Of CNVs observed in each breed, 98% are also observed in multiple breeds. CNVs predicted to disrupt gene function are significantly less common than expected by chance. We identify a significant overrepresentation of peaks of GC content, previously shown to be enriched in dog recombination hotspots, in the vicinity of CNV breakpoints. CONCLUSIONS: A number of the CNVs identified by this study are candidates for generating breed-specific phenotypes. Purifying selection seems to be a major factor shaping structural variation in the dog genome, suggesting that many CNVs are deleterious. Localized peaks of GC content appear to be novel sites of CNV formation in the dog genome by non-allelic homologous recombination, potentially activated by the loss of PRDM9. These sequence features may have driven genome instability and chromosomal rearrangements throughout canid evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Unknown 91 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 31%
Researcher 25 25%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 8 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2013.
All research outputs
#1,756,276
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,457
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,912
of 186,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#15
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.