You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is the mid-wall linear high intensity “lesion” on cardiovascular magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00665-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masashi Nakamura, Tomoyuki Kido, Kuniaki Hirai, Kohei Tabo, Yuki Tanabe, Naoto Kawaguchi, Akira Kurata, Teruhito Kido, Osamu Yamaguchi, Teruhito Mochizuki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| India | 7 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Japan | 5 | 7% |
| Mexico | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Oman | 1 | 1% |
| Algeria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 18% |
| Scientists | 12 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#990,740
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#25
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,780
of 428,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.