↓ Skip to main content

Endobronchial ultrasound is feasible and safe to diagnose pulmonary embolism in non-transportable SARS-CoV-2 ARDS patients requiring extracorporeal lung support

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Endobronchial ultrasound is feasible and safe to diagnose pulmonary embolism in non-transportable SARS-CoV-2 ARDS patients requiring extracorporeal lung support
Published in
Critical Care, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03292-9
Authors

Maxens Decavele, Valery Trosini-Désert, Samia Boussouar, Baptiste Duceau, Martin Dres, Alexandre Demoule

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,960,462
of 21,251,543 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,326
of 5,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,894
of 326,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,251,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them