↓ Skip to main content

Rapid positioning of nasogastric tube by ultrasound in COVID-19 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Rapid positioning of nasogastric tube by ultrasound in COVID-19 patients
Published in
Critical Care, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03285-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anyu Qian, Shanxiang Xu, Xiao Lu, Luping Tang, Mao Zhang, Xiao Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,469
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,365
of 429,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#115
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.