Title |
Maternal and newborn health priority setting partnership in rural Uganda in association with the James Lind Alliance: a study protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00231-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James Ditai, Monicah Nakyazze, Deborah Andrinar Namutebi, Proscovia Auma, Martin Chebet, Cynthia Nalumansi, Grace Martha Nabulo, Kenneth Mugabe, Toto Anne Gronlund, Anthony Mbonye, Andrew D. Weeks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Uganda | 2 | 18% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Malawi | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 47% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 25 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,726,821
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#260
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,982
of 408,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.