You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adverse childhood experience and adult persistent pain and disability: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01474-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
André Bussières, Jan Hartvigsen, Manuela L. Ferreira, Paulo H. Ferreira, Mark J. Hancock, Laura S. Stone, Timothy H. Wideman, Jill Boruff, Ask Elklit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 50% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 88 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,189,226
of 24,394,820 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#363
of 2,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,802
of 412,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#13
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,394,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.