↓ Skip to main content

The Recovery Agenda: The Shared Role of Peers and Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Recovery Agenda: The Shared Role of Peers and Professionals
Published in
Public Health Reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/bf03391703
Authors

William L. White, Arthur C. Evans

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 25%
Psychology 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#274
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,969
of 320,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.