↓ Skip to main content

The Recovery Agenda: The Shared Role of Peers and Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Recovery Agenda: The Shared Role of Peers and Professionals
Published in
Public Health Reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/bf03391703
Authors

William L. White, Arthur C. Evans

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 28%
Psychology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,040,026
of 15,922,434 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#174
of 180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,450
of 159,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,434 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them