↓ Skip to main content

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-4-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D Oxman, Holger J Schünemann, Atle Fretheim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Peru 2 2%
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 106 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 32 27%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 23 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,701,137
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#984
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,710
of 157,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.