↓ Skip to main content

Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-4-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D Oxman, Holger J Schünemann, Atle Fretheim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Peru 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Saudi Arabia 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 88 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Professor 7 7%
Other 27 27%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 16 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,189,557
of 15,922,938 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#716
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,693
of 157,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them