↓ Skip to main content

Isolation of an imported subgenotype B5 strain of human enterovirus A71 in Chongqing City, China, 2014

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isolation of an imported subgenotype B5 strain of human enterovirus A71 in Chongqing City, China, 2014
Published in
Virology Journal, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12985-016-0571-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Yang, Yong Zhang, Dongmei Yan, Shuangli Zhu, Dongyan Wang, Tianjiao Ji, Wei Huang, Hongqiu An, Wenbo Xu

Abstract

Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) is the main pathogen responsible for large outbreaks of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) in mainland China, and the dominant EV-A71 strains belong to subgenotype C4. To date, only one imported subgenotype B5 of EV-A71 has been reported in Xiamen City Fujian Province, 2009. Here, we report on another imported subgenotype B5 of EV-A71 isolated from a HFMD patient in Chongqing City in 2014 (strain CQ2014-86/CQ/CHN/2014, hereafter refer as CQ2014-86). The VP1 coding sequence and the whole genome sequence revealed that strain CQ2014-86 shares the high nucleotide identity with Vietnamese strains isolated in 2011-2013, suggesting that strain CQ2014-86 may have been imported from Vietnam. In the 5'UTR, P2 and P3 regions, recombination events were found between strain CQ2014-86 and other EV-A, such as coxsackievirus A4 (CV-A4), CV-A5, CV-A14 and CV-A16. This is the second report on importation of subgenotype B5 of EV-A71 in China, implying that we need to pay more attention to the importation of different subgenotypes of EV-A71.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,465,704
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#2,445
of 3,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,436
of 352,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#45
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.