You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meal analysis for understanding eating behavior: meal- and participant-specific predictors for the variance in energy and macronutrient intake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0440-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina Schwedhelm, Khalid Iqbal, Lukas Schwingshackl, George O. Agogo, Heiner Boeing, Sven Knüppel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 33% |
| South Africa | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,866,455
of 24,212,485 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#802
of 1,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,575
of 356,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,212,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.