↓ Skip to main content

Is a positive Christie-Atkinson-Munch-Peterson (CAMP) test sensitive enough for the identification of Streptococcus agalactiae?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is a positive Christie-Atkinson-Munch-Peterson (CAMP) test sensitive enough for the identification of Streptococcus agalactiae?
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-018-3561-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dacheng Guo, Yu Xi, Shanmei Wang, Zeyu Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 22%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 22 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,648,640
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#6,574
of 7,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,974
of 438,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#176
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.