You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Family planning in Rwanda is not seen as population control, but rather as a way to empower the people”: examining Rwanda’s success in family planning from the perspective of public and private stakeholders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Contraception and Reproductive Medicine, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40834-018-0072-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hilary M. Schwandt, Seth Feinberg, Akrofi Akotiah, Tong Yuan Douville, Elliot V. Gardner, Claudette Imbabazi, Erin McQuin, Maha Mohamed, Alexis Rugoyera, Diuedonné Musemakweli, Cliff Wes Nichols, Nelly Uwajeneza Nyangezi, Joshua Serrano Arizmendi, Doopashika Welikala, Benjamin Yamuragiye, Liliana Zigo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,505,209
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#40
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,963
of 438,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contraception and Reproductive Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.