↓ Skip to main content

A 10 year (2000–2010) systematic review of interventions to improve quality of care in hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 10 year (2000–2010) systematic review of interventions to improve quality of care in hospitals
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary C Conry, Niamh Humphries, Karen Morgan, Yvonne McGowan, Anthony Montgomery, Kavita Vedhara, Efharis Panagopoulou, Hannah Mc Gee

Abstract

Against a backdrop of rising healthcare costs, variability in care provision and an increased emphasis on patient satisfaction, the need for effective interventions to improve quality of care has come to the fore. This is the first ten year (2000-2010) systematic review of interventions which sought to improve quality of care in a hospital setting. This review moves beyond a broad assessment of outcome significance levels and makes recommendations for future effective and accessible interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 20 13%
Other 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 11%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 32 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2013.
All research outputs
#5,827,361
of 21,338,376 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,798
of 7,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,465
of 147,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,338,376 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them