You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An automatic method for counting wheat tiller number in the field with terrestrial LiDAR
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00672-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuan Fang, Xiaolei Qiu, Tai Guo, Yongqing Wang, Tao Cheng, Yan Zhu, Qi Chen, Weixing Cao, Xia Yao, Qingsong Niu, Yongqiang Hu, Lijuan Gui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 19 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 25% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,625,985
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#628
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,177
of 411,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#19
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.