You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the potential of using urine and saliva specimens for malaria diagnosis in suspected patients in Ghana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03427-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enoch Aninagyei, Joseph Abraham, Paul Atiiga, Shadrach Duodu Antwi, Stephen Bamfo, Desmond Omane Acheampong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Gabon | 1 | 10% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,969,136
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,234
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,387
of 416,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#23
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.