↓ Skip to main content

Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Published in
Systematic Reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01471-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adel Elfeky, Katie Gillies, Heidi Gardner, Cynthia Fraser, Timothy Ishaku, Shaun Treweek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 19 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,190,157
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#353
of 2,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,837
of 432,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#11
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.