| Title |
Credible practice of modeling and simulation in healthcare: ten rules from a multidisciplinary perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-020-02540-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmet Erdemir, Lealem Mulugeta, Joy P. Ku, Andrew Drach, Marc Horner, Tina M. Morrison, Grace C. Y. Peng, Rajanikanth Vadigepalli, William W. Lytton, Jerry G. Myers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 47 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,444,500
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,234
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,700
of 409,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#41
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.