| Title |
Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with COVID-19 ARDS undergoing noninvasive ventilation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03306-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Menzella, Matteo Fontana, Carlo Salvarani, Marco Massari, Patrizia Ruggiero, Chiara Scelfo, Chiara Barbieri, Claudia Castagnetti, Chiara Catellani, Giorgia Gibellini, Francesco Falco, Giulia Ghidoni, Francesco Livrieri, Gloria Montanari, Eleonora Casalini, Roberto Piro, Pamela Mancuso, Luca Ghidorsi, Nicola Facciolongo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Comoros | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 54 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,669,432
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,970
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,614
of 432,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#118
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.