You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inequalities in the burden of female breast cancer in Brazil, 1990–2017
|
---|---|
Published in |
Population Health Metrics, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12963-020-00212-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra, Mário Círio Nogueira, Deborah Carvalho Malta, Camila Soares Lima Côrrea, Maria de Fatima Marinho de Souza, Maria Paula Curado, Mariana Santos Felisbino-Mendes, Meghan Mooney, Mohsen Naghavi, Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 23% |
Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#15,104,977
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#297
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,776
of 411,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.