You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trends in prevalence and mortality burden attributable to smoking, Brazil and federated units, 1990 and 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Health Metrics, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12963-020-00215-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Carvalho Malta, Luisa Sorio Flor, Ísis Eloah Machado, Mariana Santos Felisbino-Mendes, Luisa Campos Caldeira Brant, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Renato Azeredo Teixeira, Eduardo Marques Macário, Marissa B. Reitsma, Scott Glenn, Mohsen Naghavi, Emmanuela Gakidou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 39 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,219,892
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#275
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,861
of 411,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.