↓ Skip to main content

Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05748-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Purva Abhyankar, Joyce Wilkinson, Karen Berry, Sarah Wane, Isabelle Uny, Patricia Aitchison, Edward Duncan, Eileen Calveley, Helen Mason, Karen Guerrero, Douglas Tincello, Doreen McClurg, Andrew Elders, Suzanne Hagen, Margaret Maxwell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 39 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Engineering 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 43 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#12,882,622
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,204
of 7,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,774
of 411,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#95
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.