↓ Skip to main content

Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05748-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Purva Abhyankar, Joyce Wilkinson, Karen Berry, Sarah Wane, Isabelle Uny, Patricia Aitchison, Edward Duncan, Eileen Calveley, Helen Mason, Karen Guerrero, Douglas Tincello, Doreen McClurg, Andrew Elders, Suzanne Hagen, Margaret Maxwell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Unspecified 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 25 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#10,248,857
of 19,044,106 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,499
of 6,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,668
of 322,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,044,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them