You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anopheline and human drivers of malaria risk in northern coastal, Ecuador: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03426-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James A. Martin, Allison L. Hendershot, Iván Alejandro Saá Portilla, Daniel J. English, Madeline Woodruff, Claudia A. Vera-Arias, Bibiana E. Salazar-Costa, Juan José Bustillos, Fabián E. Saénz, Sofía Ocaña-Mayorga, Cristian Koepfli, Neil F. Lobo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 14% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,450,458
of 24,615,949 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#788
of 5,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,632
of 418,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#16
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.