You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide analysis of tandem repeats in Daphnia pulex - a comparative approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-11-277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoph Mayer, Florian Leese, Ralph Tollrian |
| Abstract |
DNA tandem repeats (TRs) are not just popular molecular markers, but are also important genomic elements from an evolutionary and functional perspective. For various genomes, the densities of short TR types were shown to differ strongly among different taxa and genomic regions. In this study we analysed the TR characteristics in the genomes of Daphnia pulex and 11 other eukaryotic species. Characteristics of TRs in different genomic regions and among different strands are compared in details for D. pulex and the two model insects Apis mellifera and Drosophila melanogaster. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 29% |
| Researcher | 21 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2017.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,135
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,116
of 104,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#66
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.