You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How useful are malaria risk maps at the country level? Perceptions of decision-makers in Kenya, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03425-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ludovica Ghilardi, George Okello, Linda Nyondo-Mipando, Chawanangwa Mahebere Chirambo, Fathy Malongo, Jenna Hoyt, Jieun Lee, Yovitha Sedekia, Justin Parkhurst, Jo Lines, Robert W. Snow, Caroline A. Lynch, Jayne Webster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Malawi | 2 | 13% |
| Ghana | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| Congo | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Design | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,024,489
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#727
of 5,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,065
of 412,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#14
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.