↓ Skip to main content

A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
504 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-302
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Liu, Lili Yu, Scott V Edwards

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
Brazil 6 2%
Spain 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 352 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 25%
Researcher 83 21%
Student > Master 55 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 7%
Professor 22 6%
Other 69 18%
Unknown 37 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 248 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 15%
Computer Science 12 3%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Mathematics 7 2%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 44 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,184,578
of 19,019,810 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,471
of 2,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,936
of 323,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,019,810 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them