You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary care management for optimized antithrombotic treatment [PICANT]: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-79 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Siebenhofer, Lisa R Ulrich, Karola Mergenthal, Ina Roehl, Sandra Rauck, Andrea Berghold, Sebastian Harder, Ferdinand M Gerlach, Juliana J Petersen |
| Abstract |
Antithrombotic treatment is a continuous therapy that is often performed in general practice and requires careful safety management. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a best-practice model that applies major elements of case management and patient education, can improve antithrombotic management in primary healthcare in terms of reducing major thromboembolic and bleeding events. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Librarian | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2012.
All research outputs
#12,859,601
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,330
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,470
of 170,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.