You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carotid geometry is an independent predictor of wall thickness – a 3D cardiovascular magnetic resonance study in patients with high cardiovascular risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00657-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoph Strecker, Axel Joachim Krafft, Lilli Kaufhold, Markus Hüllebrandt, Susanne Weber, Ute Ludwig, Martin Wolkewitz, Anja Hennemuth, Jürgen Hennig, Andreas Harloff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,880,957
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#911
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,527
of 426,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.