↓ Skip to main content

Trends in availability and prices of subsidized ACT over the first year of the AMFm: evidence from remote regions of Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trends in availability and prices of subsidized ACT over the first year of the AMFm: evidence from remote regions of Tanzania
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-299
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prashant Yadav, Jessica L Cohen, Sarah Alphs, Jean Arkedis, Peter S Larson, Julius Massaga, Oliver Sabot

Abstract

The Affordable Medicines Facility for malaria (AMFm) is a pilot supra-national subsidy program that aims to increase access and affordability of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) in public sector clinics and private retail shops. It is unclear to what extent the AMFm model will translate into wide scale availability and price reductions in ACT, particularly for rural, remote areas where disparities in access to medicines often exist. This study is the first to rigorously examine the availability and price of subsidized ACT during the first year of the AMFm, measured through retail audits in remote regions of Tanzania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Vietnam 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 11 15%
Lecturer 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,147,830
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,843
of 5,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,960
of 178,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#17
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.