↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of a wide gap between COVID-19 in humans and animal models: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Evidence of a wide gap between COVID-19 in humans and animal models: a systematic review
Published in
Critical Care, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03304-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salleh N. Ehaideb, Mashan L. Abdullah, Bisher Abuyassin, Abderrezak Bouchama

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 135 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 40 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 49 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,984,053
of 20,023,934 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,723
of 5,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,976
of 327,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,023,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them