↓ Skip to main content

Awake prone positioning does not reduce the risk of intubation in COVID-19 treated with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy: a multicenter, adjusted cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
296 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
Title
Awake prone positioning does not reduce the risk of intubation in COVID-19 treated with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy: a multicenter, adjusted cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03314-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Ferrando, Ricard Mellado-Artigas, Alfredo Gea, Egoitz Arruti, César Aldecoa, Ramón Adalia, Fernando Ramasco, Pablo Monedero, Emilio Maseda, Gonzalo Tamayo, María L. Hernández-Sanz, Jordi Mercadal, Ascensión Martín-Grande, Robert M. Kacmarek, Jesús Villar, Fernando Suárez-Sipmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 296 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 398 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 43 11%
Student > Master 41 10%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Researcher 35 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 6%
Other 73 18%
Unknown 146 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Engineering 5 1%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 159 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 190. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#213,979
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#93
of 6,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,403
of 436,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.