Title |
To what extent do supervised drug consumption services incorporate non-injection routes of administration? A systematic scoping review documenting existing facilities
|
---|---|
Published in |
Harm Reduction Journal, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12954-020-00414-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kelsey A. Speed, Nicole D. Gehring, Katherine Launier, Daniel O’Brien, Sandy Campbell, Elaine Hyshka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 14 | 42% |
United States | 4 | 12% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 38 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 39 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,284,053
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Harm Reduction Journal
#206
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,394
of 422,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harm Reduction Journal
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.