↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of a self-report instrument to assess social support and physical environmental correlates of physical activity in adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of a self-report instrument to assess social support and physical environmental correlates of physical activity in adolescents
Published in
BMC Public Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne K Reimers, Darko Jekauc, Filip Mess, Nadine Mewes, Alexander Woll

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and predictive validity of a new German self-report instrument to assess the influence of social support and the physical environment on physical activity in adolescents.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Psychology 12 13%
Sports and Recreations 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 17 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2012.
All research outputs
#3,156,630
of 4,505,402 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,179
of 5,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,341
of 78,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#270
of 330 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 330 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.