You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identifying dispensing errors in pharmacies in a medical science school in Trinidad and Tobago
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40545-020-00263-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandeep Maharaj, Adrian Brahim, Horry Brown, Danielle Budraj, Vatalie Caesar, Anyse Calder, Deisha Carr, Dion Castillo, Kevin Cedeno, Manthan D. Janodia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 48 | 64% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 53 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,666,921
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#74
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,472
of 414,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.