You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders’ perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00227-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Heckert, Laura P. Forsythe, Kristin L. Carman, Lori Frank, Rachel Hemphill, Emily A. Elstad, Laura Esmail, Julie Kennedy Lesch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,690,168
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#287
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,272
of 414,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.